?

Log in

No account? Create an account
"Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint!” [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
"i am the spirit that always denies"

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

(no subject) [Sep. 14th, 2011|11:34 pm]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|]

dr bruce dan recently died of acute myelogenous
leukemia (a rare blood and bone marrow cancer).
he was "the federal researcher who helped establish
a link between the life-threatening disease toxic
shock syndrome and the use of tampons"

a man whose name more women should probably know.


i've read a bit of the blog he kept describing
the progression and treatment of his cancer,
very interesting:

BruceDan's Blog



here's his obituary from the new york times
LinkLeave a comment

attica video [Sep. 13th, 2011|06:13 pm]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|, , ]

not much on youtube...
isn't that sad?




LinkLeave a comment

attica... attica... attica... [Sep. 13th, 2011|06:07 pm]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|, , ]

on this day 40 years ago... ny state troopers killed 10 hostages
and 29 inmates (along with injuring 89 others)retaking attica
state prison. the riot started sept 9th and you may not have
heard anyone talking about it since it'll be forever overshadowed
by rememberances of 9-11 but don't forget the terrible injustice
wrought that day.


an article from ten years ago...
"remembering attica" from the village voice


a time for truth from the forgotten victims of attica
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

more songs on the 'news of the world' [Jul. 13th, 2011|10:19 pm]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|, , ]

almost forgot my favorite one!!!

Link1 comment|Leave a comment

everything bad i knew about the 'news of the world' i learned in the eighties... [Jul. 13th, 2011|07:17 pm]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|, , ]



Link3 comments|Leave a comment

why can't people walk in a straight line? [Jun. 18th, 2011|11:56 pm]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|]

listened to this segment by robert krulwich
on npr a long time ago but only got around
to checking out the animation now...

LinkLeave a comment

so ridiculous! [Jun. 18th, 2011|11:21 pm]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|]

these are hysterically great...






LinkLeave a comment

(no subject) [Mar. 8th, 2011|03:28 am]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|, , , ]

in this previous post i described the ninth circuit court's decision
regarding a recent california law limiting the sale of violent video games
to minors. the supreme court heard oral arguements for the case in
november 2010 and their ruling on the case should be issued soon!

the best collection of information on the case
can be found on scotusblog here:
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association



Argument preview: Kids and video games
by Lyle Denniston is quoted below...

The petition raised two questions — whether violent video games are protected
at all by the First Amendment when sold to minors, and, if they were protected
and restrictions had to be judged under a “strict scrutiny” standard, whether
the state had to prove a direct link between the game’s violence and harm to
minors before such games could be banned for young customers.

To pass strict scrutiny, the law or policy must satisfy three prongs:

First, it must be justified by a compelling governmental interest.
While the Courts have never brightly defined how to determine if an interest
is compelling, the concept generally refers to something necessary or crucial,
as opposed to something merely preferred. Examples include national security,
preserving the lives of multiple individuals, and not violating explicit
constitutional protections.

Second, the law or policy must be narrowly tailored to achieve that goal or
interest. If the government action encompasses too much (overbroad) or fails
to address essential aspects of the compelling interest (under-inclusive), then
the rule is not considered narrowly tailored.

Finally, the law or policy must be the least restrictive means for achieving that
interest. More accurately, there cannot be a less restrictive way to effectively
achieve the compelling government interest, but the test will not fail just because
there is another method that is equally the least restrictive. Some legal scholars
consider this 'least restrictive means' requirement part of being narrowly tailored,
though the Court generally evaluates it as a separate prong.


here are my favorite quotes from the oral arguments on novenber 2nd...

JUSTICE ALITO:
Well, I think what Justice Scalia wants to know is what James
Madison thought about video games. (Laughter.) Did he enjoy them?

JUSTICE SCALIA:
No, I want to know what James Madison thought about violence. Was there
any indication that anybody thought, when the First Amendment was adopted,
that there -- there was an exception to it for -- for speech regarding violence?
Anybody?


~~~

JUSTICE KAGAN:
Do you think Mortal Kombat is prohibited by this statute?
MR. MORAZZINI:
I believe it's a candidate, Your Honor, but I haven't played the game and been
exposed to it sufficiently to judge for myself.

JUSTICE KAGAN:
It's a candidate, meaning, you know, yes, a reasonable jury could find that
Mortal Kombat -- which is, you know, an iconic game, which I'm sure half of the
clerks who work for us spent considerable amounts of time in their adolescence
playing. (Laughter.)

MR. MORAZZINI:
Justice Kagan -
JUSTICE SCALIA:
I don't know what she's talking about. (Laughter.)


justice kagan brings up a very sentient point... when mortal combat first
came out people were as outraged as they are about grand theft auto today.
strange since it seems so tame and the violence so cartoonishly silly when
you watch now.

LinkLeave a comment

goodbye jane... [Feb. 28th, 2011|06:57 pm]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|, , ]

LinkLeave a comment

this march at the vortex room! [Feb. 28th, 2011|06:52 pm]
"i am the spirit that always denies"
[Tags|]









LinkLeave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | 10 entries back ]
[ go | earlier/later ]